Wasnt Nafta supposed to create a zone like the European Union in N AmericA?
Mexicans if we saw them as a opportunity instead of a threat we would be able to confront the Asian economies in a better way?
Answers:
How can an American woman who's had a child with an illegal immigrant pursue child support?
NAFTA is a bogus arrangement that is slowly destroying the US economy. If it is allowed to continue, the US will be draged down to the level of Mexico, a corrupt, poverty-stricken nation overrun with drug cartels.Ten percent of all Mexicans have already sneaked into the US illegally and to allow them to continue to do so will pose an even greater threat to the US employment picture as employers hire them for cheap labor and fire off legitimate American citizens.
There is nothing good in NAFTA for most Americans, NOTHING. Europe is a totally different situation from the US, a tiny patchwork of small countries jammed together, not at all like the US.
Mexican girls boo miss america for illegal immigration?
Here is some information about the NAFTA agreement.
The North American Free Trade Agreement NAFTA called for immediately eliminating duties on the majority of tariffs between products traded among the United States, Canada and Mexico, and gradually phasing out other tariffs, over a 15-year period. Restrictions were to be removed from many categories, including motor vehicles and automotive parts, computers, textiles, and agriculture. The treaty also protected intellectual property rights (patents, copyrights, and trademarks), and outlined the removal of investment restrictions among the three countries. The agreement is trilateral in nature (that is, the stipulations apply equally to all three countries) in all areas except agriculture, in which stipulation, tariff reduction phase-out periods and protection of selected industries, were negotiated bilaterally. Provisions regarding worker and environmental protection were added later as a result of supplemental agreements signed in 1993.
This agreement was an expansion of the earlier Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement of 1988. Unlike the European Union, NAFTA does not create a set of supranational governmental bodies, nor does it create a body of law superior to national law. NAFTA is a treaty under international law. Under United States law it is classed as a congressional-executive agreement rather than a treaty, reflecting a peculiar sense of the term "treaty" in United States constitutional law that is not followed by international law or the laws of other nations.
* the second paragraph gives the explanation I believe you are looking for.
Do you feel that your state is doing a good job of dealing with illegal immigration?
If you knew that it was about to limit Your Civil Liberties You would think more than twice about it! America is an Original Ideology, not a Plagerized copy of Europe and their already failed policies and fatalistic views! Compare it to the Ten Planks of Communism and wake up! It's a violation of the United States Constitution that is IRREVOCABLE BY ANY TREATY!
If your family were hungry or starving, what would you do?
No, it never was supposed to do that or it would not have been voted in. I say repeal it, in any event.
It was free trade, not a union of countries. Taxes and tariffs removed, not forcing more children into our schools than they can handle.
It is an entirely different thing.
SPP is trying to become that, but that is why 14 states already have referendums against that, as well.
The Immigration information post by website user ,ImmigrationReady.com not guarantee correctness.